Opinion
3:22-cv-301-JR
08-25-2022
JOHN MORRIS III, Plaintiff, v. BIOTRONIK, INC.; JOHN DOES 110; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; ROE NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS 1-10; and ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, United States District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on July 11, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant's motion to compel arbitration, dismiss this action, and deny Defendant's previous motion to dismiss as moot. F&R, ECF 45. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [45].
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration [37] is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [13] is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.