From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morin v. Duhe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Dec 2, 2020
CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00592 (W.D. La. Dec. 2, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00592

12-02-2020

TRAVIS JAMES MORIN v. M BOFILL DUHE ET AL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA

JUDGMENT

THIS MATTER was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. Following receipt of the Magistrate Judge's conclusions, Rec. Doc. 20, this Court has conducted an independent review of the record, including Plaintiff's objections. In addition to that review, this Court takes judicial notice of the fact that the state court proceedings referred to by both parties remain pending after the November 16, 2020 trial date was continued. Thus, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation correctly determined that Younger abstention is appropriate for all claims asserted in this matter, and it adopts the findings and conclusions in Parts I and II as its own. Accordingly, consistent with the report and recommendation, this Court declines to exercise its jurisdiction over this case at this time. In light of that conclusion, the Court need not address Defendants' alternative arguments or the Magistrate Judge's related recommendations. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant M. Bofill Duhe's Motion to Dismiss, Rec. Doc. 13, is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 2nd day of December, 2020.

/s/_________

MICHAEL J. JUNEAU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morin v. Duhe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Dec 2, 2020
CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00592 (W.D. La. Dec. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Morin v. Duhe

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS JAMES MORIN v. M BOFILL DUHE ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 6:20-CV-00592 (W.D. La. Dec. 2, 2020)

Citing Cases

Haynes v. Lee

The Court notes, but does not explicitly find, that the DA Defendants are not likely protected by the…