From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morhy v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 14-301-BRO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 14-301-BRO (PJW)

01-16-2015

AARON M. MORHY, Petitioner, v. DAVID LONG, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: January 16, 2015.

/s/_________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
C:\Users\jyerke\AppData\Local\Temp\notesC7A056\Order accep r&r.wpd


Summaries of

Morhy v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 14-301-BRO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Morhy v. Long

Case Details

Full title:AARON M. MORHY, Petitioner, v. DAVID LONG, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 14-301-BRO (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2015)

Citing Cases

Shearrod v. Smith

Petitioner was sentenced to a parolable life sentence. "The United States Supreme Court has never suggested…