From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morhart v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1999
267 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted December 1, 1999

December 27, 1999

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated August 24, 1998, which granted the defendants' respective motions, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Guy Barbieri, Mineola, N.Y., for appellants.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent City of New York.

Marino, Tudisco Scharf, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Arthur J. Marino of counsel), for respondent Queens Boulevard Trust.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with one bill of costs, the motions are denied, and the complaint and all cross claims are reinstated.

CPLR 3212(a), as amended effective January 1, 1997, requires a motion for summary judgment to be made within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, except with leave of court on good cause shown (see, CPLR 3212[a], as amended by L 1996, ch 492). The plaintiffs filed their note of issue in April 1997. The defendants' respective motions for summary judgment were made in May 1998, more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, and without a showing of good cause for the delay (see, Scocozza v. Tolia, 262 A.D.2d 548 [2d Dept., June 21, 1999]; Deinhardt v. Vought, 258 A.D.2d 432 ; Anzalone v. Varis, 254 A.D.2d 381 ; Krug v. Jones, 252 A.D.2d 572 ; Phoenix Garden Rest. v. Chu, 245 A.D.2d 164 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morhart v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1999
267 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Morhart v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARY MORHART, et al., appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
700 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Wagner v. City of New York

Here, the motion was made well after the 120-day period , without any showing of good cause for the delay.…

Parker v. New York City Transit Auth

CPLR 3212(a) provides that a summary judgment motion must be made within 120 days after the filing of the…