From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Laroy

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 9, 2005
474 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2005)

Summary

In Morgan, the state intermediate appellate court had stated that black ice was not "open and obvious" as a matter of law.

Summary of this case from FAGG v. SUPER FOOD SERVICES, INC.

Opinion

No. 128769.

November 9, 2005.


Summary Dispositions.

SC: 128769, COA: 253789.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the Kalamazoo Circuit Court, for the reasons stated by the Kalamazoo Circuit Court. See Kenny v. Kaatz Funeral Home, Inc, 472 Mich 929 (2005).

CAVANAGH, J. I would deny leave to appeal

KELLY, J. I would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Laroy

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 9, 2005
474 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2005)

In Morgan, the state intermediate appellate court had stated that black ice was not "open and obvious" as a matter of law.

Summary of this case from FAGG v. SUPER FOOD SERVICES, INC.
Case details for

Morgan v. Laroy

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES LAROY and LUANN LAROY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 9, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 917 (Mich. 2005)
705 N.W.2d 685

Citing Cases

Ververis v. Hartfield Lanes

In the absence of such a factor, we must determine which of the two rules suggested in Judge GRIFFIN's…

Slaughter v. Blarney Castle

Id. at 66. In determining which rule applies, this Court considered the fact that the Supreme Court summarily…