From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Braswell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-452 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2014)

Summary

During the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting analysis, “the burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its alleged conduct” after the plaintiff proves their cause of action

Summary of this case from S.S. v. Detroit Indep. Sch. Dist.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-452 c/w 4:11cv40

03-26-2014

VALDA MORGAN Plaintiff, v. RAY BRASWELL, ET. AL., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 19, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Denton Independent School District's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 223) be GRANTED in its entirety and that Plaintiff take nothing by any of her claims.

The court has made a de novo review of pro se Plaintiff's objections, as well as Defendant's response. The court has further reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Plaintiff's Evidence (Dkt. 284) and Defendant's response.

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Plaintiff's Evidence (Dkt. 284) is DENIED. The court is further of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court.

Therefore, Denton Independent School District's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 223) is GRANTED in its entirety and Plaintiff shall take nothing by any of her claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morgan v. Braswell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-452 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2014)

During the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting analysis, “the burden shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its alleged conduct” after the plaintiff proves their cause of action

Summary of this case from S.S. v. Detroit Indep. Sch. Dist.
Case details for

Morgan v. Braswell

Case Details

Full title:VALDA MORGAN Plaintiff, v. RAY BRASWELL, ET. AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-cv-452 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2014)

Citing Cases

S.S. v. Detroit Indep. Sch. Dist.

When a Plaintiff relies on circumstantial evidence to support a race discrimination claim, that claim is…

S.S. v. Detroit Indep. Sch. Dist.

R&R at 11. Plaintiff relied on circumstantial evidence to show intentional discrimination; thus, the R&R…