From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 2000
268 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 11, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about May 5, 1998, which, in an action arising out of an automobile accident in Queens County, denied defendants-appellants' motion to change venue from Bronx County to Queens County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Stephen D. Perlmutter for Plaintiffs-Respondents.

John S. Park for Defendants-Appellants.

WILLIAMS, J.P., MAZZARELLI, WALLACH, ANDRIAS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


The motion court correctly held that the Queens County police officer who responded to the accident would not be so inconvenienced by having to go to the Bronx as to warrant a change of venue to that county (see, Pittman v. Maher, 202 A.D.2d 172, 177;compare, Torres v. Larsen, 195 A.D.2d 285). Nor is such a change warranted by the Queens County residence of most of the parties (see, Dashman v. Really Useful Theatre Co., 167 A.D.2d 325). No proper showing of inconvenience is made with respect to plaintiff's medical providers.

The Bronx venue was initially proper, based on the residence of defendant Landrum, at which location he was served with process. Only the alleged convenience of Queens non-party residents is raised as a basis for Queens venue.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Morales v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 11, 2000
268 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Morales v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MORALES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WELLS FARGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 257 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 370

Citing Cases

Walton v. Mercy Coll.

See Montero v. Elrac, 300 AD2d 9 (1st Dept. 2002); Costanza v. Cornell, 175 AD2d 696 (1st Dept. 1991).See…

Faneite v. Matthew

The convenience of public employees should be given "more than ordinary" consideration (Kennedy v C.F.…