From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2001
282 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 10, 2001.

Judgment, Court of Claims, New York County (Alan Marin, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2000, after trial, dismissing a claim under the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act (Court of Claims Act § 8-b), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Martin S. Rothman, for Claimant-Appellant

Frank K. Walsh, for Defendant-Respondent

Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Andrias, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's finding, largely one of credibility (see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495; Vinciguerra v. State of New York, 262 A.D.2d 743, 744), that claimant failed to meet his "heavy burden of proving [his] innocence by clear and convincing proof" (Reed v. State of New York, 78 N.Y.2d 1, 11; see, Taylor v. State of New York, 266 A.D.2d 385, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 764). We have considered and rejected claimant's argument that the trial court erred in excluding certain out-of-court statements made by the complaining witness at claimant's criminal trial.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Morales v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2001
282 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Morales v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAUL MORALES, Claimant-Appellant v. STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 10, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 860

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kennedy

Such proof cannot be loose, equivocal or contradictory. Morales v. State, 282 A.D.2d 245 (1st Dept. 2001).…