From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 23, 2013
NO. ED CV 13-01673-VBF-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

Summary

dismissing a claim not cognizable on federal habeas review, with prejudice “because, like untimeliness or lack of merit, noncognizability cannot be cured”

Summary of this case from George v. Alaska Va Healthcare Sys.

Opinion

NO. ED CV 13-01673-VBF-SH

12-23-2013

JAIME SAUL MORALES, Petitioner, v. DAVID LONG, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order issued this same date, final judgment is entered in favor of respondent David Long and against petitioner Jaime Saul Morales. DATED: December 23, 2013

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morales v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 23, 2013
NO. ED CV 13-01673-VBF-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

dismissing a claim not cognizable on federal habeas review, with prejudice “because, like untimeliness or lack of merit, noncognizability cannot be cured”

Summary of this case from George v. Alaska Va Healthcare Sys.

dismissing a claim not cognizable on federal habeas review, with prejudice “because, like untimeliness or lack of merit, noncognizability cannot be cured”

Summary of this case from Bachmeier v. Einerson
Case details for

Morales v. Long

Case Details

Full title:JAIME SAUL MORALES, Petitioner, v. DAVID LONG, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

NO. ED CV 13-01673-VBF-SH (C.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

Citing Cases

House v. Cal. Inst. for Men - Chino

The Court finds, however, that it is unnecessary to conduct an exhaustion analysis here. If the Court…

George v. Alaska Va Healthcare Sys.

Cf. Culpepper v. Biddle, Case No. CV 18-8826-JFW (GJS), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187497, at *8, *11 (C.D. Cal.…