From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 11, 2012
381 P.3d 643 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 59706.

04-11-2012

Charles MOORE a/k/a Charles Lavelle Moore, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City


Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of robbery and burglary while in possession of a firearm. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

Appellant argues that his sentence of two concurrent terms of 24 to 120 months in prison constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment and an abuse of discretion by the district court because the sentence is disproportionate to his role in the crimes. Strict proportionality between crime and sentence is not required; rather, only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime is forbidden. Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000–01 (1991) (plurality opinion). Appellant's sentence falls within the statutory limits and is not so unreasonably disproportionate to his offense as to shock the conscience. Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996). And he has not demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in its sentencing decision. See Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987) (noting broad discretion afforded district courts in sentencing matters). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 11, 2012
381 P.3d 643 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles MOORE a/k/a Charles Lavelle Moore, Appellant, v. The STATE of…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 643 (Nev. 2012)