From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 16, 2015
180 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D15–4440.

12-16-2015

David M. MOORE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

David M. Moore, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


David M. Moore, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. The circuit court has recently issued an order to show cause why the pending motion should not be granted. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that where the trial court has issued a recent order to show cause, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 16, 2015
180 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:David M. MOORE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 16, 2015

Citations

180 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)