From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. PNC Mortg., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION
Jul 22, 2014
Case No. CV414-127 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 22, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV414-127

07-22-2014

SYLVESTER MOORE, Plaintiff, v. PNC MORTGAGE, N.A. and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Sylvester Moore, proceeding pro se, brought this "quiet title" and lender liability action against entities involved in the foreclosure of his Liberty County, Georgia property. Doc. 1-1. Illuminating the fact that his complaint is virtually incomprehensible, both defendants move to dismiss Moore's case for failure to state a claim. Docs. 5 & 7. Their motions are unopposed under L.R. 7.5 (no response means no opposition). Finding the motions well supported, they must be GRANTED. Hence, defendants' motion to stay this litigation pending the Court ruling on their dismissal motion (doc. 9) is GRANTED.

Just one example is Count II of his Complaint: "Violation of Contract Also Validation Which Went Unanswered in Support of Accounting Fraud/Securities Fraud Causing a Credit Default Swap and Criminal Intent." Doc. 1-1 at 7. Another is Count III: "Violation Of The Servicer Performance Agreement Also Violation Of Dual Tracking." Id. at 9. Under this Count, he explains that the "defendant(s) violated the Service Performance Agreement due to their poor bookkeeping of accounts, also a violation of the REMIC LAW, which is a Tax Violation under the IRS code, which has criminal intent to defraud the Government, and must be reported to the Comptroller of the Currency in Washington D.C." Id. at 9 ¶ 32.
Judges must liberally construe a pro se litigant's pleading, but "this leniency does not give a court license to serve as de facto counsel for a party, or to rewrite an otherwise deficient pleading in order to sustain an action." Boles v. Riva, 2014 WL 1887376 at * 1 (11th Cir. May 13, 2014) (quotes and cite omitted); Sctry, Fl. Dept. of Corr. v. Baker, 406 F. App'x 416, 422 (11th Cir. 2010). Nor can they confer legitimacy upon the surreal.

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED this 22th day of July, 2014.

__________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Summaries of

Moore v. PNC Mortg., N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION
Jul 22, 2014
Case No. CV414-127 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Moore v. PNC Mortg., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER MOORE, Plaintiff, v. PNC MORTGAGE, N.A. and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

Date published: Jul 22, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV414-127 (S.D. Ga. Jul. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

Moore v. PNC Mortg., N.A.

Doc. 1, as amended, doc. 3. His previous FDCPA lawsuit, Moore v. PNC Mortgage, NA, 414CV127 (S.D. Ga.),…