From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Kirkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. CV 12-6811-MAN (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-6811-MAN

01-17-2013

Michael Anthony Moore v. Robert Kirkman, et al.

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): None Present Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable MARGARET A. NAGLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

+-----------------------------------------------+ ¦E. Carson ¦N/A ¦N/A ¦ +------------+-------------------------+--------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter / Recorder¦Tape No.¦ +-----------------------------------------------+

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):

None Present

Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT OF CASE The Court having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice to the right, upon good cause being shown within 60 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. cc: All parties of record

_____ : ________

Initials of Preparer efc


Summaries of

Moore v. Kirkman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
Case No. CV 12-6811-MAN (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Kirkman

Case Details

Full title:Michael Anthony Moore v. Robert Kirkman, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 12-6811-MAN (C.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Brown

". . . for there is no case which goes to the extent of holding that where the decedent was himself a trustee…

In re Megrath's Estate

"The provisions of the above statute are plain and explicit, and we see no reason why full force and effect…