Moore v. International Broth. of Elec. Workers Local 569

Full title: Lawrence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1998

139 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

139 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 1998) Lawrence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 569; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; J.J. Barry; S.R. McCann; Dick Robbins; San Diego Electrical Pension Trust; San Diego Electrical Health and Welfare Trust; San Diego Electrical Industry Training Trust; San Diego Electrical Industry Education and Manpower Development Trust; Labor Management Cooperative Fund; San Diego National Electrical Contractors Association; Fischbach & Moore, Inc.; Tom Pridemore; Paul Blackwood; Wayne Lovin; Jim Westfall; Wilmer Bass; Dick Smith; Terry Godshalk; Joe Heisler; George England; Ray Altmeyer; John Simpson; Jim Alysworth; Charles Wilder; Joe Mansolillo; Ron Cooper; Dave Allison; Ken Stuart; Dave Raspolich; Wayne Van Der Linden; Jack Zwart; Mike Sparks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55495. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit February 13, 1998

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding

MEMORANDUM ^*

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

Moore finally contends that the district court erred by requiring a $2,000 bond because Moore already had a balance of $906.28 remaining of the $1,000 bond he had posted in his first appeal of CV-91-1543. We disagree. The district court properly awarded the balance remaining of the $1,000 bond to the trust defendants pursuant to liens the trust defendants had against the $1,000 bond, making a new bond necessary.

AFFIRMED.