From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Hinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 29, 1917
107 S.C. 290 (S.C. 1917)

Opinion

9691

May 29, 1917.

Before MAULDIN, J., Cheraw, December, 1915. Appeal dismissed.

Action by D.F. Moore against G.W. Hinson. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Messrs. Pollock Pegues, for appellant.

Messrs. Stevenson Prince, for respondent.


May 29, 1917. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


When this case was called for argument, the respondent's attorney announced that his information was by a telegram from his office at Cheraw that the case was settled. Appellant's attorney said he had no information concerning the alleged settlement, and argued the case. Investigation develops the fact that the case was settled between the parties, money paid to the clerk of Court of Chesterfield county by the respondent, and received by the appellant.

It is, therefore, ordered that this action on the part of the appellant worked a discontinuance of the appeal, and the Court will not consider the appeal.


Summaries of

Moore v. Hinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 29, 1917
107 S.C. 290 (S.C. 1917)
Case details for

Moore v. Hinson

Case Details

Full title:MOORE v. HINSON

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: May 29, 1917

Citations

107 S.C. 290 (S.C. 1917)
92 S.E. 619

Citing Cases

S.C. Hwy. Dept. v. McKeown Food Store

The question is accordingly not a proper subject of review. Moore v. Hinson, 107 S.C. 290, 92 S.E. 619; Reedy…

Powell v. State

While many believe that acts of sodomy, even those involving consenting adults, are morally reprehensible,…