From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Giles

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 12, 2007
4 So. 3d 595 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)

Summary

In Moore v. Giles, 49 Conn. 570, an action by a father to remove as a cloud upon his title a deed executed by him to an infant and placed on record by him, the trial court found as a fact that the grantor, influenced by fear of a creditor, as well as by affection for the grantee "with the intent and purpose of giving to the said * * * (grantee) his title to said land, * * * executed said deed and caused the same to be recorded."

Summary of this case from King v. Antrim Lbr. Co.

Opinion

No. CR-06-0659.

March 12, 2007.


Decisions of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Without Opinions Dismissed.


Summaries of

Moore v. Giles

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Mar 12, 2007
4 So. 3d 595 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)

In Moore v. Giles, 49 Conn. 570, an action by a father to remove as a cloud upon his title a deed executed by him to an infant and placed on record by him, the trial court found as a fact that the grantor, influenced by fear of a creditor, as well as by affection for the grantee "with the intent and purpose of giving to the said * * * (grantee) his title to said land, * * * executed said deed and caused the same to be recorded."

Summary of this case from King v. Antrim Lbr. Co.
Case details for

Moore v. Giles

Case Details

Full title:Richard Moore v. J.C. Giles, warden

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 12, 2007

Citations

4 So. 3d 595 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

King v. Antrim Lbr. Co.

It depends upon the grantor's intention. Humiston v. Preston, 66 Conn. 579, 34 A. 544; Moore v. Giles, 49…

Wiley v. London Lancashire Fire Ins. Co.

Similarly, proof of acceptance may be by any act or expression which shows an intention on the part of the…