From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. First National Bank of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 31, 1977
233 S.E.2d 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53326.

ARGUED JANUARY 12, 1977.

DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1977.

Action on note. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Smith.

Kathleen Moore, pro se. Maley Crowe, Ronald F. Johnson, for appellee.


The plaintiff's complaint sought recovery on the unpaid balance due on a sales contract for a used automobile. The defendant by answer denied the material allegations of the complaint and plead accord and satisfaction and that the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages. On demand by the defendant, the case was tried by a jury.

Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered on the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Two grounds are contained in the enumeration of errors: (1) the court erred in not dismissing the plaintiff's original complaint; (2) the court erred in that it did not make a finding of fact and conclusion of law in the case. Held:

1. Insofar as the first ground raises a question as to the sufficiency of service of process, there was a waiver by the failure to object in the lower court. CPA § 12 (b) and (h) (Code Ann. § 81A-112 (b) and (h); Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 622; 1967, pp. 226, 231; 1968, pp. 1104, 1106; 1972, pp. 689, 692, 693)); American Finance Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 135 Ga. App. 24 ( 217 S.E.2d 364); Pascoe Steel Corp. v. Turner County Bd. of Education, 139 Ga. App. 87, 89 ( 227 S.E.2d 887). See Echols v. Dyches, 140 Ga. App. 191 ( 230 S.E.2d 315). For pertinent cases prior to the Civil Practice Act, see Cherry v. McCutchen, 68 Ga. App. 682, 689 (1) ( 23 S.E.2d 587); Talbott Sons v. Collier, 102 Ga. 550 (2) ( 28 S.E. 225); Cutliffe v. Pryse, 187 Ga. 51, 54 ( 200 S.E.2d 124); Chance v. Planters c. Cooperative, 219 Ga. 1 ( 131 S.E.2d 541).

2. Since the case was tried before a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law under CPA § 52 (Code Ann. § 81A-152; Ga. L. 1969, pp. 645, 646; 1970, pp. 170, 171) were not required. Thomas v. Jackson, 238 Ga. 90 (1).

Judgment affirmed. Stolz and Shulman, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 12, 1977 — DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1977.


Summaries of

Moore v. First National Bank of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 31, 1977
233 S.E.2d 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Moore v. First National Bank of Atlanta

Case Details

Full title:MOORE v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 31, 1977

Citations

233 S.E.2d 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
233 S.E.2d 26

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Bentley

1. Any defect in the service of process must be deemed waived, as there is no indication in the record before…

Rawlins v. Busbee

(b). "A defense of insufficiency of process or insufficiency of service of process is waived if it is neither…