From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 6, 2001
790 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 1D00-1497

Opinion filed August 6, 2001.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mark H. Hofstad, Judge.

Joey D. Oquist, Esquire, St. Petersburg and Bill McCabe, Esquire, Longwood, for Appellant.

Kevin G. Malchow, Esquire and Pamela J. Kemp, Esquire of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.


REVERSED. See § 440.20(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1994); see also Franklin v. Northwest Airlines, 778 So.2d 418, 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ("The language in subsection (4) states that a carrier `shall admit or deny compensability within 120 days after the initial provision of compensation or benefits.' The employer/carrier failed to act pursuant to the options permitted under the statute, and they never sent a `120 day letter. . . . Having failed to deny compensability within the time period set forth in the statute, the employer/carrier waived the right and are deemed to have accepted compensability."); Bynum Transp. v. Snyder, 765 So.2d 752, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 6, 2001
790 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Moore v. CTL Distribution, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. MOORE, Appellant, v. CTL DISTRIBUTION, INC. and COMCAR…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 6, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Jeffrey's Steel v. Conibear Equip

Provision of the 120 day letter is only required where the carrier is uncertain of its obligation to provide…