From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monty v. Leis

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Apr 27, 2011
No. B225646 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 27, 2011)

Opinion


Page 537c

194 Cal.App.4th 537c __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ MARIANNE MONTY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GEORGE S. LEIS et al., Defendants and Respondents. B225646 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Sixth Division April 27, 2011

Super. Ct. No. 1340306

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 30, 2011 (193 Cal.App.4th 1367;___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

1. On page 6, in the last sentence in the first paragraph [193 Cal.App.4th 1373, advance report, 1st full par., line 5], the word "noting" is changed to "nothing," so that the sentence reads: "But nothing in section 405 limits its application to that situation."

2. On page 6 [193 Cal.App.4th 1373, advance report, 3d full par., lines 5-7], the last sentence in the third paragraph is changed to read: "Once Ford obtained a majority of the shares, it could amend the articles to authorize as many shares as required under the agreement."

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellants' petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Monty v. Leis

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Apr 27, 2011
No. B225646 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Monty v. Leis

Case Details

Full title:MARIANNE MONTY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GEORGE S. LEIS et…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

No. B225646 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 27, 2011)