From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery County v. Blacksburg

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 17, 1972
186 S.E.2d 282 (Va. 1972)

Opinion

42616 Record No. 7627.

January 17, 1972

Present, All the Justices.

Annexation — Agricultural Land — Future Development.

Not error to award Blacksburg 15 square miles of Montgomery County including large areas owned by V.P.I. and devoted to agricultural and experimentation purposes. Other areas annexed were already developed or sufficiently ready and needed for development. Growth of town tied to growth of University.

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. Hon. W. S. Jordan, Hon. D. Carleton Mayes, and Hon. J. Aubrey Matthews, judges presiding.

Affirmed.

Robert S. Fitzgerald (William J. McGhee, County Attorney for Montgomery County; Myron C. Smith; Fitzgerald, Smith Davis, on brief), for appellant.

W. H. Jolly (Warren S. Neily, Jr.; John B. Spiers, Jr.; Kime, Jolly, Clemens Canterbury, on brief), for appellee.


This annexation appeal brings up for consideration the award to the Town of Blacksburg of 15 square miles of territory in Montgomery County. The principal reason we granted the appeal was to review the inclusion in the award of what appeared to be unusually large areas of vacant or agricultural land.

The present Town consists of 2,139 acres with an estimated population of 10,427. Immediately adjacent to and occupying most of its western boundary is the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. The annexation would increase the size of the Town to approximately 11,700 acres and its population to approximately 23,000, including 6,900 resident students at V.P.I.

The evidence shows that a large percentage of the annexation area is vacant or agricultural land. The County contends that inclusion of this land in the annexation award is violative of Code Sec. 15.1-1042(a), which provides that "no land shall be taken into the [town] which is not adapted to [town] improvements, or which the [town] will not need in the reasonably near future for development," unless necessary to provide a reasonably compact body of land."

However, the record shows that not all the area awarded is available for development by the Town. The land owned by V.P.I., which includes large areas devoted to agricultural and experimental purposes, represents approximately one-third of the annexation territory and accounts for much of the percentage of vacant land included in the award. The other areas immediately adjacent to the Town are already developed. It was necessary, therefore, to go beyond the built-up areas and beyond the V.P.I. holdings to provide room for the Town to develop.

In addition, the evidence showed, as the trial court noted, that the growth of the Town had been tied in with the growth of V.P.I. and that the University's planned increase in enrollment from the present 12,000 to between 20,000 and 22,000 students would necessitate extension of the Town's boundaries to accommodate its expected future growth. It would not suffice even for the immediate future, the trial court held, merely to add the areas adjoining the present boundaries of the Town.

Further, the record discloses that much of the territory included in the annexation award, exclusive of the V.P.I. holdings, is ready for development. In fact, large portions of the area have been zoned by the County for commercial, residential, and multiple-family housing purposes. The Town has extended its water and sewerage facilities into portions of the territory, but there is a need throughout the area for such services, which the Town is capable of providing.

Thus, there was sufficient basis for the trial court to find that the territory sought was "adapted to [town] improvements" and that the Town would need the territory "in the reasonably near future for development." We hold, therefore, that inclusion of the vacant or agricultural land in the annexation award was not violative of Code Sec. 15.1-1042(a).

We have examined the other errors assigned by the County and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court but amend the decree to make the annexation effective at midnight on December 31, 1972.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Montgomery County v. Blacksburg

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 17, 1972
186 S.E.2d 282 (Va. 1972)
Case details for

Montgomery County v. Blacksburg

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY v. TOWN OF BLACKSBURG

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Jan 17, 1972

Citations

186 S.E.2d 282 (Va. 1972)
186 S.E.2d 282

Citing Cases

Rockingham v. Harrisonburg

As the process of urbanization gains momentum, the rural parts of the annexed territory will need more and…

Christiansburg v. Montgomery County

In its written opinion, the court based this financial award upon a similar award made by an annexation court…