From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

Supreme Court of California.
Nov 14, 2018
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662 (Cal. 2018)

Opinion

S251392

11-14-2018

MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY v. SCHECHTER


The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) When a settlement agreement contains confidentiality provisions that are explicitly binding on the parties and their attorneys and the attorneys sign the agreement under the legend "APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT," have the attorneys consented to be bound by the confidentiality provisions? (2) When evaluating the plaintiff's probability of prevailing on its claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, subdivision (b), may a court ignore extrinsic evidence that supports the plaintiff's claim, or accept the defendant's interpretation of an undisputed but ambiguous fact over that of the plaintiff?

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar and Kruger, JJ.


Summaries of

Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

Supreme Court of California.
Nov 14, 2018
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662 (Cal. 2018)
Case details for

Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

Case Details

Full title:MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY v. SCHECHTER

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Nov 14, 2018

Citations

239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 662 (Cal. 2018)
429 P.3d 827

Citing Cases

Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

The Supreme Court granted review. (Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter (Nov. 14, 2018, S251392) 429 P.3d 827.) It…

Milliner v. Mut. Sec., Inc.

The California Supreme Court granted review of Monster Energy on November 14, 2018, and ordered the parties…