Opinion
608778/18
07-14-2020
The MONEY SOURCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Carolle MEVS, Ralph Mevs, Clerk of the Suffolk County Traffic & Parking Violations Agency, State of New York, and Carl Mevs, Defendants.
GROSS POLOWY, LLC, 1775 Wehrle Dr. - Ste. 100, Williamsville, NY 14221, Attys. For Plaintiff. STIM & WARMUTH, P.C., 2 Eighth St., Farmingville, NY 11738, Attys. For PDQ Equities
GROSS POLOWY, LLC, 1775 Wehrle Dr. - Ste. 100, Williamsville, NY 14221, Attys. For Plaintiff.
STIM & WARMUTH, P.C., 2 Eighth St., Farmingville, NY 11738, Attys. For PDQ Equities
Thomas F. Whelan, J. It is,
ORDERED that this motion (#004) by PDQ Equities, LLC, brought by way of Order to Show Cause, dated November 21, 2019 (Whelan, J.S.C.), seeking an order granting leave to intervene and, upon intervention, for an order providing for an abatement in the purchase price of the property is granted in part and denied in part; and it is further
ORDERED that the cross motion (#005) by plaintiff, seeking to compel PDQ Equities, LLC to complete the closing of the residential foreclosure sale within seven (7) days of denial of PDQ Equities, LLC's order to show cause is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that PDQ Equities, LLC is directed to complete the closing of the residential foreclosure sale within fourteen (14) days of filing of the notice of entry of this short form order; and it is further
ORDERED that any and all stays set forth in the Order to Show Cause, dated November 21, 2019, are vacated in their entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff is directed to file a notice of entry within five days of receipt of this Order pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 202.5-b(h)(2).
Familiarity with this Court's Order confirming the Referee Report and Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale dated July 11, 2019 is presumed. Thereafter, on October 23, 2019, the property was sold to non-party movant, PDQ Equities, LLC ("PDQ"). Pursuant to the Terms of Sale, the closing was to take place on or before November 22, 2019. On October 26, 2019, however, PDQ's representatives visited the property and observed that two large trees fell into a pool in the backyard. PDQ now seeks permission to intervene pursuant to CPLR 1012 and an abatement of the purchase price due to the damage. The order to show cause stayed the instant action and enjoined any default on behalf of PDQ or forfeiture of its deposit pending determination of the application. The plaintiff opposed same, and has cross moved to compel PDQ to complete the closing within seven days of the within decision.
That portion of the motion (#004) by non-party winning bidder, PDQ, seeking intervention is granted. PDQ relies on General Obligations Law § 5-1311, which permits a purchaser who experiences damage to purchased property prior to transfer of legal title to seek either rescission of the contract or abatement of the purchase price. However, while plaintiff concedes the remedy, it is plaintiff's position that the initial risk of loss, which is on the seller, here, due to the contract between the parties, that risk has been transferred to PDQ. The Court must agree. The critical language in the Terms of Sale (see NINTH paragraph) is "[p]urchaser assumes all risk of loss or damage to the premises from the date of sale until the date of closing and thereafter." So, in this case, the controlling date is not the date of sale at the auction but the date of closing. Therefore, General Obligations Law § 5-1311 does not apply to the facts of this case.
While the Court agrees that the cross motion is untimely pursuant to CPLR 2215, since PDQ moved by order to show cause, plaintiff is permitted to file its opposition to the order to show cause on the return date. The Court has considered same as opposition. In any event, the Court will not limit the time for the rescheduled closing to just seven (7) days, but rather to extend the time frame to fourteen (14) days. The closing is simply ministerial at this point in time.
Suspensions Relating to Foreclosure Actions
In 2015, the NYS Unified Court System Caseload Management Project showed that there were 17,674 total pending foreclosure actions in Suffolk County and as of the first term of 2020 there were still pending 6,140. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Andrew Cuomo declared a State disaster emergency, the authority for which is set forth below.
Executive Law § 29-a - the Authority for Emergency Powers
Executive Law § 29-a, entitled "Suspension of other laws," expressly permits the Governor ( § 29-a[1.] ) to "temporarily suspend specific provisions of any statute, local law, ordinance, or orders, rules or regulations, or parts thereof, of any agency during a state disaster emergency, ..." The suspension order is clearly limited in duration as follows ( § 29-a[2.][a.] ):
no suspension or directive shall be made for a period in excess of thirty days, provided, however, that upon reconsideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the governor may extend the suspension for additional periods not to exceed thirty days each;
Pursuant to § 29-a ( [2.][e.] ) the suspension order or directive :
Executive Law 29-a was amended, effective March 3, 2020 to April 29, 2021, pursuant to L.2020, c. 23, § 4, to authorize the Governor to issue directives during a state disaster emergency.
shall provide for the minimum deviation from the requirements of the statute, local law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation suspended consistent with the disaster action deemed necessary;
The Executive Orders as Relating to Foreclosure Actions
Every Executive Order makes explicit reference to Executive Law § 29-a for its authority.
On March 7, 2020, Governor Cuomo issued Executive Order No. 202, which declared a State of Emergency for the entire State of New York, due to the increasing transmission of COVID-19. Executive Order No. 202.8
Thereafter, on March 20, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order No. 202.8, entitled "Continuing Temporary Suspension and Modification of Laws Relating to the Disaster Emergency," which temporarily suspended or modified any time limitations set forth in any statute, legislative or administrative act, from March 20, 2020 until April 19, 2020. In particular, "[i]n accordance with the directive of the Chief Judge of the State to limit court operations to essential matters, ... any specific time limit for the commencement, filing, or service of any legal action, notice motion, or other process or proceeding ... is hereby tolled from the date of this executive order until April 19, 2020."
Additionally, with regard to foreclosure actions, the following directive was issued through April 19, 2020:
There shall be no enforcement of ... a foreclosure of any residential ... property for a period of ninety days.
This provision was in direct conflict with the Executive Law § 29-a(2), which limits Executive action to only thirty days.
Executive Order No. 202.14
However, prior to the running of thirty days of Executive Order No. 202.8, the Governor issued Executive Order No. 202.14, on April 7, 2020, which continued the suspension and modifications of Executive Order No. 202.8 for thirty days until May 7, 2020. This Order contained various specific modifications of laws.
Executive Order No. 202.28
This Executive Order, issued on May 7, 2020, continued the suspension and modifications of 202.8 and 201.14 for an additional thirty days until June 6, 2020. This Order discontinued various suspensions and modifications and specifically modified others laws, but with regard to foreclosures the Order held that through June 6, 2020:
There shall be no initiation of a proceeding or enforcement of ... a foreclosure of any residential ... mortgage for nonpayment of such mortgage, owned or rented by someone that is eligible for unemployment insurance or benefits under state or federal law or otherwise facing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic for a period of sixty days beginning on June 20, 2020.
This provision, which added a hardship affirmative defense to new foreclosure actions or the enforcement of an action, conflicts with Executive Law § 29-a(2.)(a.), in that it extends for more than thirty days, beyond May 7, 2020.
Executive Order No. 202.38
But then, on June 6, 2020, within the thirty day time frame, the Governor issued Executive Order No. 202.38, which continued the suspension and modifications of 202.14 and 202.27 and 202.28 until July 6, 2020. The Order also added various directives to commercial buildings and retail store owners.
Executive Order No. 202.48
Finally, on July 6, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order No. 48. While continuing the suspension and modifications for another thirty days through August 5, 2020, it discontinued various suspensions and modifications of numerous statutes, including residential foreclosures. As to foreclosures, EO 202.48 states:
The directive contained in Executive Order 202.28, as extended, that prohibited initiation of a proceeding or enforcement of either an eviction of any residential or commercial tenant, for nonpayment of rent or a foreclosure of any residential or commercial mortgage, for nonpayment of such mortgage, is continued only insofar as it applies to a commercial tenant or commercial mortgagor, as it has been superseded by legislation for a residential tenant, and residential mortgagor, in Chapter 112, 126, and 127 of the Laws of 2020; ...
So, in light of EO 202.48, there is no longer any directives from the Governor with regard to residential foreclosure actions, which are now subject to the statutory changes set forth in Chapter 112, 126, and 127 of the Laws of 2020. Those laws are discussed below. The prohibition set forth in 202.14, that is, "[t]here shall be no enforcement of ... a foreclosure of any residential ... property ..." (see also 202.8), is no longer in effect. Additionally, EO 202.28, which directed that there can be "no initiation of a proceeding or enforcement of ... a foreclosure of any residential ... mortgage for nonpayment of such mortgage, owned or rented by someone that is eligible for unemployment insurance or benefits under state or federal law or otherwise facing financial hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic ...," is no longer in effect and is superceded by the new legislation. The Executive Orders, as set forth above, demonstrate compliance with the dictates of Executive Law § 29-a(2.)(e.), in that, as time passes, the Orders were modified "to provide for the minimum deviation from the requirements of the statute, ... suspended consistent with the disaster action deemed necessary."
New Legislation - Residential Mortgage Forbearance Plans
On June 17, 2020, Governor Cuomo signed into law a new section of the Banking Law, that is, § 9-x. This section created new procedures with regard to forbearance of residential mortgage payments affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The "covered period" begins on March 7, 2020 and runs until there are no restrictions on non-essential gatherings of any size for the county of the residence. The new law requires the borrower to be a natural person and the loan be a "home loan," as defined in RPAPL § 1304(6)(a). A "qualified mortgagor" must also "demonstrate[ ] financial hardship as a result of COVID-19 during the covered period[.]"
There is little doubt that the new statute is designed to only address mortgages affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and should not apply to borrowers who defaulted before the start date of March 7, 2020. Such is evident from the reading of § 9-x(4), which makes this section "a condition precedent to commencing a foreclosure action stemming from missed payments which would have otherwise been subject to this section." Therefore, this new law does not apply to actions commenced prior to March 7, 2020. Importantly, the new law only applies to New York State regulated mortgage loans and not federal instrumentalities or a corporate government agency of the state constituted as a political subdivision and public benefit corporation.
NYS Department of Financial Services (DFS) Regulatory Orders
Mortgage servicing is highly regulated in New York under the state's DFS, which issued Emergency Regulations and Guidance Letters in keeping with the Governor's Executive Orders.
On March 24, 2020, DFS issued Emergency Regulations (Part 119 of Title 3 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York) requiring New York-regulated banks and mortgage servicers to grant a 90-day forbearance to New York residents with New York State mortgages, who demonstrate financial hardship caused by COVID-19. This emergency regulation is not applicable to, and does not affect any mortgage loans made, insured, or securitized by any agency or instrumentality of the United States, any Government Sponsored Enterprise (Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae), or a Federal Home Loan Bank. It is estimated that about 70% of mortgage loans are federally insured.
Previously, by Guidance Letter dated March 19, 2020 to all New York State Regulated and Exempt Mortgage Servicers, DFS directed support for borrowers impacted by COVID-19, with the following:
1) Forbearing mortgage payments for 90 days from their due dates;
2) Refraining from reporting late payments to credit rating agencies for 90 days;
3) Offering mortgagors an additional 90-day grace period to complete trial loan modifications, and ensuring that late payments during the COVID-19 pandemic does not affect their ability to obtain permanent loan modifications;
4) Waiving late payment fees and any online payment fees for a period of 90 days;
5) Postponing foreclosures and evictions for 90 days;
6) Ensuring that mortgagors do not experience a disruption of service if the mortgage servicer closes its office, including making available other avenues for mortgagors to continue to manage their accounts and to make inquiries; and
7) Proactively reaching out to mortgagors via app announcements, text, email or otherwise to explain the above-listed assistance being offered to mortgagors.
So, with regard to New York State regulated mortgage servicers, they were directed by DSF to postpone foreclosure for 90 days from March 19, 2020 until June 17, 2020. With the passage of Banking Law § 9-x, DFS has not issued any new Guidance Letters. Administrative Orders of the Courts
There have been numerous Administrative Orders issued by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts (CAJ) and the local District Administrative Judge for Suffolk County (DAJ). On March 16, 2020, AO 68/20 was issued by the CAJ, seeking to "mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak upon users, visitors, staff, and judicial officers of the Unified Court System." Under the category of Supreme Court, only "essential applications as the court may allow" were permitted. Under the category of "Housing matters," one finds the following: "All residential foreclosure proceedings shall be suspended statewide until further notice."
The DAJ issued Order No. 45-20, on May 28, 2020, which reopened the Courthouses on May 29, 2020, except as follows:
ORDERED that all foreclosure proceedings are suspended and no foreclosure auctions shall be scheduled or held. Reference is made to Administrative Order 68/20 and Executive Orders 202.8, 202.14 and 202.28; ...
A Memorandum from the DAJ, dated June 5, 2020, discussed the Phase II Plan to Resume In-Person Court Operations, but noted the following:
All foreclosure proceedings are suspended (Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks' AO/87/20, 10th Judicial District, Suffolk County's AO 45-20).
A further Memorandum from the DAJ, dated June 18, 2020, discussed the Phase III Plan to Resume In-Person Court Operations, but noted the following:
All foreclosure proceedings are suspended (Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks' AO/87/20, 10th Judicial District, Suffolk County's AO 45-20).
On June 23, 2020, the CAJ issued AO/131/20, which requires all commencement papers for residential foreclosures to include two additional documents. The documents include a good faith affirmation that the new action is consistent with all state and federal restrictions on foreclosure proceedings, including that set forth in Executive Order 202.28. As noted above, 202.28 has been superceded by statute, as per EO 202.48. The second document adds an additional notice to tenants as to the possible filing of a late answer.
This June 23, 2020 AO contains the additional directive (AO/131/20):
Consistent with prior and current gubernatorial Executive Orders (EO/202.8, EO/202.14, EO/202.28, EO/202.38) and Administrative Order AO/68/20, foreclosure matters commenced on or before March 16, 2020 shall continue to be suspended until further order; ...
This order shall take effect on June 24, 2020, and shall remain in effect for such time as state and federal emergency measures addressing the COVID-19 pandemic amend or suspend statutory provisions governing foreclosure proceedings, or until further order.
On the same day, June 23, 2020, the CAJ issued a Memorandum, entitled "Procedure for Addressing Residential and Commercial Foreclosure Proceedings." It discussed temporary protocols for handling foreclosures and states: "[n]o motions other than motions to discontinue a pending case shall be entertained or decided .... At or before the expiration of the Governor's Executive Order suspending statutory timetables, we will issue further directives on the processing of these cases."
The June 23, 2020 AO/131/20, while making mention of the Governor's previous EOs, expands "suspension" to all aspects of pre-COVID-19 foreclosure actions, and not just enforcement of same. Importantly, however, the duration of same runs only until "state and federal emergency measures addressing the COVID-19 pandemic amend or suspend statutory provisions governing foreclosure proceedings, or until further order."
The Memorandum of the same date limits motion practice to only motions to discontinue and links the duration of same to the directives of the Governor's EO's as to the continued suspension of the statute of limitations and not to the emergency measures on residential foreclosures. Moreover, Banking Law § 9-x only relates to New York State regulated mortgage servicers. Therefore, it becomes necessary to examine federal emergency measures.
In the meantime, since May 6, 2020, the Appellate Division, Second Department has resumed all appeals, including foreclosure appeals, by ADM 2020-0506.
In recognition of the Executive Order, EO-202.48, the CAJ issued a new Memorandum, dated July 7, 2020 and a new Administrative Order, AO/143/20, of the same date, which revoked the service of an attorney's affirmation with the complaint in a foreclosure actions, thereby amending AO/127/20 and AO/131/20. Therefore, with the Governor's recent issuance of EO-48, there is no longer a state emergency measure addressing the COVID-19 pandemic as for residential foreclosures. Servicers and plaintiffs, initiating new actions, have to comply with the newly enacted Banking Law § 9-x and upon federal emergency measures, discussed below.
The CARES Act and differing Federal Guidelines
On March 13, 2020, President Donald Trump declared a national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease outbreak, under the National Emergencies Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq. ).
Federally insured mortgage loan agencies, such as Freddie Mac, also issued various Guidance Bulletins to mortgage servicers. Bulletin 2020-4, issued on March 18, 2020, clarified that a COVID-19 related hardship is eligible for forbearance plans and various loan modification plans, if the borrower was current or less than 31 days delinquent. Importantly, this Bulletin issued the following Foreclosure Sale Moratorium:
Servicers must suspend all foreclosure sales for the next 60 days. This foreclosure suspension does not apply to Mortgages
on properties that have been determined to be vacant or abandoned.
Therefore, only foreclosure sales were forbidden until May 17, 2020, by Bulletin 2020-4.
With the passage of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economy Security Act (CARES Act), signed by the President on March 27, 2020, borrowers who were facing hardship in the repayment of federally backed mortgage loans were provided a right to request mortgage payment forbearance, upon the submission of a request to the servicer and an affirmation of a financial hardship caused by the emergency, "regardless of delinquency status" ( 15 USCA § 9056 [b] ). The CARES Act also imposed the following 60-day foreclosure moratorium until May 15, 2020, except where the property is vacant or abandoned (see 15 USCA § 9056 [c][2] ):
Except with respect to a vacant or abandoned property, a servicer of a Federally backed mortgage
loan may not initiate any judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process, move for a foreclosure judgment or order of sale, or execute a foreclosure-related eviction or foreclosure sale for not less than the 60-day period beginning on March 18, 2020.
So, with relation to foreclosure actions, the CARES Act created a 60-day moratorium on (1) initiation of a foreclosure action, (2) motions for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and (3) the execution of an actual foreclosure sale. The moratorium of the CARES Act has not been amended or extended by Congress beyond May 15, 2020.
However, various federal agencies began issuing temporary letters, guidelines or orders to servicers of federally-backed loans.
Freddie Mac
Freddie Mac issued Guidance Bulletin 2020-10, on April 8, 2020, which stated under the heading "Foreclosure moratorium":
As provided in the CARES Act, Servicers must suspend all foreclosure actions, including foreclosure sales, through May 17, 2020 . This includes initiation of any judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process, move for foreclosure judgment or order of sale. This foreclosure suspension does not apply to Mortgages on properties that have been determined to be vacant or abandoned.
As noted above, the language of the CARES Act set forth a moratorium for three events, commencement of an action, motions for a judgment and the actual foreclosure sale. It appears that the Bulletin can be read more expansively than the wording of the CARES Act itself.
One day prior to the termination date of the CARES Act moratorium, Freddie Mac issued Guidance Bulletin 2020-16, on May 14, 2020, which, in part, stated:
We are extending the foreclosure moratorium announced in Bulletin 2020-4 and 2020-10 . Servicers must suspend all foreclosure actions, including foreclosure sales, through June 30, 2020 . This includes initiation of any judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process, move for foreclosure judgment or order of sale. This foreclosure suspension does not apply to
Mortgages on properties that have been determined to be vacant or abandoned.
As noted above, the CARES Act only provided for a limited moratorium until May 15, 2020. Bulletin 2020-16 does not express the legal authority for any extension of the COVID-19 foreclosure moratorium beyond the three items listed above. Again, the Bulletin appears to be broader in scope and wording. Then, Freddie Mac issued Guidance Bulletin 2020-25, on June 24, 2020, which contained the following:
We are extending the foreclosure moratorium announced in Bulletins 2020-4 , 2020-10 and 2020-16 . Servicers must suspend all foreclosure actions, including foreclosure sales, through August 31, 2020 . This includes initiation of any judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process, move for foreclosure judgment or order of sale. This foreclosure suspension does not apply to Mortgages on properties that have been determined to be vacant or abandoned.
Once again, this Bulletin fails to set forth the legal authority for this extension of the CARES Act moratorium, which was limited in scope and duration. While the Guidance Bulletins set forth above related to Freddie Mac, under the controlling authority of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the moratorium also applies to Fannie Mae backed mortgages.
The FHFA notes that Advisory Bulletins do not have the force of a regulation or an order, but does reflect the position of FHFA and are followed by supervisory staff.
VBA
Similarly, the Veterans Benefits Administration issued Circulars announcing a moratorium on foreclosures, with the most recent being Circular 26-22, issued on June 17, 2020. That Circular extended the moratorium to August 31, 2020. The moratorium "applies to the initiation of foreclosures, and to the completion of foreclosures in process." So, there cannot be the filing of new foreclosure action, or the completion, which this Court believes to be a motion for a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale or an order of eviction. FHA
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), issued Mortgagee Letter 2020-04, on March 18, 2020, which noted that "the Secretary of HUD is authorizing a 60-day moratorium on foreclosures" on FHA-insured Single Family mortgages. In particular, "[t]he moratorium applies to the initiation of foreclosures and to the completion of foreclosures in process." No authority is offered for the moratorium powers of the Secretary of HUD.
Mortgagee Letter 2020-06 of April 1, 2020 offers a special loss mitigation option to mortgagees who are current as of March 1, 2020.
Mortgagee Letter 2020-13 of May 14, 2020, extends the moratorium set forth in Mortgagee Letter 2020-04 until June 30, 2020. However, the Letter appears to now contain a broader reach than either the CARES Act or Letter 2020-04, stating: "The moratorium applies to the initiation of foreclosures and to foreclosures in process."
Then, on June 17, 2020, by Mortgagee Letter 2020-19, the moratorium on FHA-insured loans is extended to August 31, 2020.
NHLP
Housing assistance agencies that have examined the various federal agency programs, such as the National Housing Law Project, have issued advisories that conclude the following as to foreclosure protections (Updated: June 18, 2020 COVID-19 Crisis):
What it does : Prevents mortgage
servicers from initiating a judicial or non-judicial foreclosure, seeking a court order for a foreclosure judgment or order of sale, holding a foreclosure sale or executing a foreclosure-related eviction.
While acknowledging the expiration of the CARES Act moratorium, the Update also noted that "all covered federal agencies have announced extensions through June 30 [now August 30]."
Summary as to Suspensions Relating to Foreclosure Actions
In an effort to ascertain what, if anything, can be addressed in its existing inventory, this Court meticulously examined the above laws, Executive Orders, Administrative Orders, Memoranda, Guidelines, Bulletins and Temporary Letters.
There are important points to remember, including (1) that the moratorium of the CARES Act has expired; (2) the Governor's most current EO, that is, 202.48, only precludes enforcement of commercial foreclosure proceedings; and (3) the most recent and controlling AO from the CAJ, that is, AO/131/20 (as amended), only remains in effect for such time "as state and federal emergency measures addressing the COVID-19 pandemic amend or suspend statutory provisions governing foreclosure proceedings..." There is no longer any state prohibition on pre-COVID-19 residential foreclosure proceedings and the new state legislation, detailed above, is addressed to initiation of new proceedings.
The federal temporary guidelines for Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and VBA precludes servicers and plaintiffs from the initiation of any judicial or non-judicial foreclosures, motions for foreclosure judgment or order of sale and actual foreclosure sales until August 31, 2020. Only actions involving FHA insured mortgages are apparently under a broader prohibition, applying to "foreclosures in process."
As noted above, there were 6,140 pending foreclosure actions in Suffolk County in the first term of 2020. This Part's inventory consists of nearly 725 pending foreclosure actions as of the 5th Term of 2020, which are all pre-March 7, 2020 actions. Therefore, with regard to these pending actions and submitted motions, this Court will not address any new cases initialized after March 7, 2020. New cases will only be addressed to see if they involve vacant or abandoned properties. Additionally, this Court will not address actions concerning FHA insured mortgages or pending motions for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, or eviction. All other motions emanating from the pre-COVID-19 filed cases, will be addressed by the Court.
This analysis is designed to comply with the numerous state and federal emergency measures and does not seek to address such issues as the authority of the CAJ or DJ to regulate the adjudicative responsibilities of the trial courts, whether the institution of a moratorium, normally a legislative function, falls within the authority of the CAJ "to regulate practice and procedure in the courts," (Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers , 88 A.D.2d 136, 143-4, 452 N.Y.S.2d 220 [2d Dept. 1982] ), and whether the Administrative Board needed to be consulted (see NY Const. Art VI, § 30 ; Judiciary Law § 212[2][d] ). Nor does it address the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency.
Therefore, enforcement proceedings, including the entering of a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, the scheduling of a Foreclosure Sale and/or the issuance of an eviction order are, and will be, stayed and adjourned, pending further order of the Court.
In the instant case, the Court, therefore, grants in part and denies in part PDQ's motion (#004), and denies plaintiff's cross motion (#005) in its entirety, as indicated above.