From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moller v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 30, 2007
43 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1181.

August 30, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered December 13, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability on their claim under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Melito Adolfsen P.C., New York (Abe M. Rychik of counsel), for appellants.

Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman MacKauf, New York (Rhonda E. Kay of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Williams and Buckley, JJ.


Plaintiff worker was in the process of hoisting a two-ton structural piece from an elevated height to a platform. Before the piece could be placed and stabilized on the platform, the hoisting mechanism failed, causing injury to the worker. Under these circumstances, it is evident there was a violation of section 240 (1) ( see e.g. Boyle v 42nd St. Dev. Project, Inc., 38 AD3d 404). We further note the absence of evidence that the worker's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident.


Summaries of

Moller v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 30, 2007
43 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Moller v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:WALTER MOLLER et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6524
840 N.Y.S.2d 901

Citing Cases

Navin v. SJP TS

There was also undisputed evidence that the proper procedure for lifting steel beams may not have been…

Paredes v. 1668 Realty Assocs. LLC

Plaintiff's affidavit and testimony that the cable that supported the bucket snapped, which caused Plaintiff…