From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Molle v. Iberlin Ranch

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Aug 12, 1980
614 P.2d 1339 (Wyo. 1980)

Opinion

No. 5347.

August 12, 1980.

Appeal from the District Court, Johnson County, Leonard McEwan, J.

Greg L. Goddard, Buffalo, for appellant.

Kim D. Cannon, Burgess Davis, Sheridan, for appellees.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon examination of the record, the Court finds that there is no final adjudication as to the rights of one or more of the parties in that no judgment has been rendered as to the remaining causes of action put forth in the plaintiff's complaint. Nor have the cross claims of the defendant Charles Molle been addressed so as to thereby state that his rights have been adjudicated.

This Court has in the past stated that no appeal will lie from an order granting a partial summary judgment as such is not a final order under Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977).

Furthermore, this Court has stated that despite an express determination by the trial court that there is no just reason for delay, this Court will not consider piecemeal appeals. Mott v. England, Wyo., 604 P.2d 560, 563 (1979); Butts v. Gierse, Wyo., 573 P.2d 1365 (1978).

On the Court's own motion, pursuant to Rule 1.02, W.R.A.P., it is

ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal be and is dismissed.


Summaries of

Molle v. Iberlin Ranch

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Aug 12, 1980
614 P.2d 1339 (Wyo. 1980)
Case details for

Molle v. Iberlin Ranch

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES (CHUCK) MOLLE, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), ALCO RANCH, A…

Court:Supreme Court of Wyoming

Date published: Aug 12, 1980

Citations

614 P.2d 1339 (Wyo. 1980)

Citing Cases

Horse Shoe L. L. v. Federal Land Bank

We have repeatedly stated that despite an express determination by the trial court that there is no just…