From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Modelle v. Fauro

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 18, 2010
9:08-CV-1042 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2010)

Summary

adopting Report & Recommendation

Summary of this case from Hill v. Donoghue

Opinion

9:08-CV-1042.

February 18, 2010

PHILIP E. MODELLE, 08-A-2310, Plaintiff, pro se, UpState Correctional Facility, Malone, New York.

OSCAR S. GRICE, 08-A-6396, Plaintiff, pro se, Attica Correctional Facility, Attica, New York.

THOMAS K. MURPHY, ESQ., MURPHY, BURNS, BARBER MURPHY, LLP, Attorneys for Defendants, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiffs, Philip E. Modelle and Oscar S. Grice, brought this civil rights action in September 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated January 27, 2010, George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 61) be granted; and plaintiff Modelle's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 38) be denied. Only plaintiff Modelle filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review of the entire file, including the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff Modelle objected, and the recommendations of magistrate Judge Lowe, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 61) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff Modelle's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 38) is DENIED;

3. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Modelle v. Fauro

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 18, 2010
9:08-CV-1042 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2010)

adopting Report & Recommendation

Summary of this case from Hill v. Donoghue
Case details for

Modelle v. Fauro

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP E. MODELLE and OSCAR S. GRICE, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID FAURO, Sheriff…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

9:08-CV-1042 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Donoghue

To the extent Plaintiff also asserts a claim under the Wiretap Act, this claim fails for the same reason.…