From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.N. v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 27, 2019
272 So. 3d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-735

03-27-2019

M.N., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Miami, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Carlos J. Martinez, Miami, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See M.F. v. State, 255 So.3d 519, 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (When reviewing the adequacy of a Richardson hearing, a "ruling that no [discovery] violation occurred moots any inquiry into whether there was procedural prejudice."); see also Mascolo v. State, 774 So.2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("[T]he trial court found there was no discovery violation. We find that the record supports the decision of the trial court and therefore we find no error.").


Summaries of

M.N. v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 27, 2019
272 So. 3d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

M.N. v. State

Case Details

Full title:M.N., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Mar 27, 2019

Citations

272 So. 3d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)