From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 12, 2001
775 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

affirming the habitual offender sentence because habitual offender sentences are not affected by Heggs and noting, "An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence."

Summary of this case from Nix v. State

Opinion

No. 5D00-1884.

Opinion filed January 12, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John Dean Moxley, Judge.

Affirmed.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm Appellant's sentence as an habitual offender as such sentences are not affected by the Supreme Court's decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence. See Ford v. State, 763 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

COBB, SAWAYA, and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 12, 2001
775 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

affirming the habitual offender sentence because habitual offender sentences are not affected by Heggs and noting, "An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence."

Summary of this case from Nix v. State
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES B. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 12, 2001

Citations

775 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Nix v. State

With that, the 3.850 hearing ended. The State argues that because Nix was found to be a habitual offender,…

Gordon v. State

As Gordon was properly sentenced as an habitual felony offender, his sentence was not affected by Heggs,…