From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 1, 2005
911 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

No. SC04-873.

September 1, 2005.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 2D03-3787 (Hillsborough County).

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.


Consistent with our decision in Woodson v. State, 889 So.2d 823 (Fla. 2004), we conclude that review herein was improvidently granted, and we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 1, 2005
911 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Demetrius MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 1, 2005

Citations

911 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2005)

Citing Cases

Adams v. State

We likewise dismissed review of Mitchell. See Mitchell v. State, 911 So.2d 93, 93 (Fla. 2005) ("Consistent…