From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 1, 1969
221 So. 2d 405 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

4 Div. 688.

April 1, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Covington County, F. M. Smith, J.

Powell Sikes, Andalusia, for appellant.

In a prosecution for receiving stolen property, ownership of property is one of the material ingredients of the offense, which must be proved by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Thompson v. State, 24 Ala. App. 224, 133 So. 314. Ownership of stolen property must be proved as laid in the indictment. Mooneyham v. State, 28 Ala. App. 228, 182 So. 78; Id. 236 Ala. 269, 182 So. 80. When the indictment alleges the property to be owned by one party and the evidence proves the owner to be another party, there is a fatal variance between the allegations and the proof, and a conviction cannot be sustained. Clonts v. State, 42 Ala. App. 287, 161 So.2d 155; Gaskin v. State, 42 Ala. App. 310, 163 So.2d 220.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Lloyd G. Hart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

All the elements of the offense were proven by the State.


The indictment charged in three counts, burglary, grand larceny, and receiving stolen property. Conviction was had under the third count, charging that defendant did buy, receive, conceal or aid in concealing seven class-room type table-model television sets, of the value of $125.00 each, one small green safe of the value of $75.00, all of the aggregate value of $950.00, "the personal property of the Covington County Board of Education," knowing said items were stolen and not having the intent to restore them to the owner.

Proof was made of the burglary and of the larceny of the articles listed in the indictment.

State's witness Glen Raley testified he was the principal of Red Level High School. The small green safe set out in the indictment was found abandoned on a dirt road approximately three miles from the Red Level High School. The television sets were never recovered.

None of the property was found in the possession of defendant. The only evidence which might tend to connect the defendant was evidence involving the safe.

The only proof of ownership of the stolen property appears from the following questions and answers in the testimony of Mr. Raley:

"Q. And that was your safe that was found out there?

"A. It was.

"Q. And you were called there to identify it?

"A. I was. Not necessarily to identify it, but I was told they had found the safe. Of course I went, and it was the safe.

"Q. What, in your best judgment, was the value of the safe at that time?

"A. I bought it second hand. Approximately $75.00."

* * * * * *

"Q. Now who did these television sets belong to?

"A. I think the County Board of Education. They provided us with them."

The State has the burden of proving the allegation of ownership of the property as laid in the indictment. Rather v. State, 24 Ala. App. 452, 136 So. 483; Smith v. State, 42 Ala. App. 650, 176 So.2d 882.

There was a fatal variance between the allegation that the small green safe was owned by the Covington County Board of Education and the proof that the owner was Glen Raley, the Principal of Red Level High School. Clonts v. State, 42 Ala. App. 287, 161 So.2d 155; Gaskin v. State, 42 Ala. App. 310, 163 So.2d 220. The trial court erred in refusing the general affirmative charge and in denying the motion for a new trial.

It is unnecessary for us to pass upon the other questions raised. They will probably not arise in the event of another trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 1, 1969
221 So. 2d 405 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bobby Gene MITCHELL v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 1, 1969

Citations

221 So. 2d 405 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
221 So. 2d 405

Citing Cases

Kilpatrick v. State

In prosecution for robbery of a revolver pistol, there was fatal variance between allegation that the…