From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.

U.S.
Jan 11, 1960
361 U.S. 231 (1960)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

No. 33.

Argued November 17, 1959. Decided January 11, 1960.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 254 F.2d 116.

Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Wayne G. Barnett, Harold C. Nystrom and Sylvia S. Ellison.

Martin P. Gallagher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Orval Yokom.

Edward Brown Williams filed a brief for the National Association of Frozen Food Packers, as amicus curiae, in support of respondents.


In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court's request, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.

U.S.
Jan 11, 1960
361 U.S. 231 (1960)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v . OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 11, 1960

Citations

361 U.S. 231 (1960)
80 S. Ct. 365

Citing Cases

Yogurt Master, Inc. v. Goldberg

Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc., 1960, 361 U.S. 388, 80 S.Ct. 453, 4 L.Ed. 2d 393; Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance…

Minnick v. California Dept. of Corrections

"In view of the ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered," I would dismiss the writ…