Summary
dismissing pro se plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim because his former employer's participation in his unemployment case did not constitute a materially adverse action
Summary of this case from Adams v. 3D Sys.Opinion
No. 14-2227
04-27-2015
Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Johnston, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA; Joshua Mark Krasner, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00584-D) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Johnston, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA; Joshua Mark Krasner, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and denying his request for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp't Sec., No. 5:14-cv-00584-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2014). We deny as moot Mitchell's motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
To the extent that Mitchell appeals the denial of his request for a temporary restraining order, such denials are generally not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We therefore dismiss the appeal insofar as he is appealing the denial of a temporary restraining order.
AFFIRMED