From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp't Sec.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2015
599 F. App'x 517 (4th Cir. 2015)

Summary

dismissing pro se plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim because his former employer's participation in his unemployment case did not constitute a materially adverse action

Summary of this case from Adams v. 3D Sys.

Opinion

No. 14-2227

04-27-2015

PAUL A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY; WAYNE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees.

Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Johnston, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA; Joshua Mark Krasner, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00584-D) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Johnston, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA; Joshua Mark Krasner, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and denying his request for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp't Sec., No. 5:14-cv-00584-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2014). We deny as moot Mitchell's motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

To the extent that Mitchell appeals the denial of his request for a temporary restraining order, such denials are generally not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We therefore dismiss the appeal insofar as he is appealing the denial of a temporary restraining order.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp't Sec.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 27, 2015
599 F. App'x 517 (4th Cir. 2015)

dismissing pro se plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim because his former employer's participation in his unemployment case did not constitute a materially adverse action

Summary of this case from Adams v. 3D Sys.
Case details for

Mitchell v. N.C. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 27, 2015

Citations

599 F. App'x 517 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Sutherlin v. Smith

See 5B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1357, at 693…

Outlaw v. RHA Health Servs.

. Sec., 76 F.Supp.3d 620, 626 (E.D. N.C. 2014), aff'd, 599 Fed.Appx. 517 (4th Cir. 2015)…