From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitcham v. Chappell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No C-97-3825 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No C-97-3825 LHK

03-06-2013

STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM, Petitioner, v KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S

SIXTH MOTION TO MODIFY FILING

DATES RE: SURREPLY

The Court has reviewed petitioner's sixth unopposed Motion To Modify Filing Dates Re: Surreply. Good cause appearing, petitioner's motion is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a surreply to claim D (ineffective assistance of counsel subclaim) no later than May 7, 2013. Respondent shall file a response no later than 30 days from the date of service of petitioner's surreply. Future extension requests in this matter shall be disfavored.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mitcham v. Chappell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
No C-97-3825 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Mitcham v. Chappell

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM, Petitioner, v KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

No C-97-3825 LHK (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)