From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miranda v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 14, 2016
181 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 2016)

Opinion

No. SC14–888.

01-14-2016

Hugo MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Carlos Jesus Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, Douglas James Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan David Tanoos, Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey Robert Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondent.


Carlos Jesus Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, Douglas James Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan David Tanoos, Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey Robert Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Miranda, 137 So.3d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miranda v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 14, 2016
181 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 2016)
Case details for

Miranda v. State

Case Details

Full title:Hugo MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jan 14, 2016

Citations

181 So. 3d 1188 (Fla. 2016)