From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miokovic Unempl. Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 15, 1961
171 A.2d 799 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)

Opinion

April 12, 1961.

June 15, 1961.

Unemployment Compensation — Willful misconduct — Deliberate falsehood concerning reason for employe's absence.

In an unemployment compensation case, in which it appeared that claimant, who was having difficulties with her husband and had been frequently absent from work for this reason, told a deliberate falsehood to her employer concerning the reason for her last absence and was discharged therefor, it was Held that claimant was guilty of willful misconduct which disqualified her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits.

Before ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., absent).

Appeal, No. 28, April T., 1961, by claimant, from decision of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-59661, in re claim of Anna Miokovic. Decision affirmed.

Anna Miokovic, appellant, in propria persona.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.


Argued April 12, 1961.


This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying benefits to claimant under § 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P. S. § 802(e), which provides: "An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week — . . . (e) In which his unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with his work. . . ." Both the bureau and the referee had rendered similar decisions.

Claimant was last employed as a sprayer by the Phoenix Glass Company, Monaca, Pennsylvania. She did not report to work on June 11, 1960, advising her employer that the reason for her absence was because she had to care for her grandchildren. The actual reason for her absence was because of difficulties with her husband. During the prior six months she was absent from work on the average of at least one day a week. On June 14, 1960 she was discharged for having falsified the reason for her absence on June 11, 1960. She admitted that she did not tell the truth to her employer as to the reason for her absence on June 11, 1960.

The record clearly reveals that claimant, who was having difficulties with her husband and had been frequently absent from work for this reason, told a deliberate falsehood to her employer concerning the reason for her absence on June 11, 1960. This was willful misconduct and disqualified her from receiving unemployment compensation benefits.

Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Miokovic Unempl. Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 15, 1961
171 A.2d 799 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)
Case details for

Miokovic Unempl. Compensation Case

Case Details

Full title:Miokovic Unemployment Compensation Case

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 15, 1961

Citations

171 A.2d 799 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)
171 A.2d 799

Citing Cases

Zelonis v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of Review

Within this definition, this Court and our Superior Court have held that a knowing falsehood or…

Vital Support Home Health Care Agency, Inc. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

a knowing falsehood or misrepresentation to the employer concerning the employee's work constitutes a willful…