From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mintz v. Astoria Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 1977
56 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

February 15, 1977


In an action on a contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 27, 1976, which denied its motion to vacate a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and against it on June 4, 1976. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, with the judgment to stand as security, and the attachment of defendant's bank account is vacated. Defendant's time to answer is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Plaintiff, although well aware of the whereabouts of his brother, the president of the defendant corporation, effected service upon the defendant by serving the Secretary of State. Such action renders Trophy Prods. v Cinema-Vue Corp. ( 53 A.D.2d 18, 19-20) apposite, for plaintiff "chose to make service on the Secretary of State, knowing that such service * * * was calculated to, and in fact did, avoid actual notice of this action until after judgment was entered." Since the judgment was procured without actual notice, relief lies under CPLR 5015 (subd [a], par 3). Moreover, defendant has demonstrated excusable default under the circumstances within CPLR 5015 (subd [a], par 1) and the existence of a "colorably meritorious defense". Latham, Acting P.J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mintz v. Astoria Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 15, 1977
56 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Mintz v. Astoria Holding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS MINTZ, Respondent, v. ASTORIA HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1977

Citations

56 A.D.2d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Fen v. Cannon Co.

here the circumstances warrant it (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 143,…

Anchor Savings Bank v. Alpha Developers, Ltd.

Having also moved under CPLR 5015 (a) (1), Alpha needed to demonstrate that its default in defending the…