Summary
affirming district court order dismissing as interlocutory a debtor's appeal from a Bankruptcy Court's orders authorizing the employment of certain financial professionals in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding
Summary of this case from Milic v. McCarthyOpinion
No. 12-1006
05-25-2012
In re: MINH VU HOANG, Debtor. MINH VU HOANG, Debtor - Appellant, v. GARY A. ROSEN; ROGER SCHLOSSBERG, Trustees - Appellees.
Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland; Roger Schlossberg, SCHLOSSBERG & ASSOCIATES, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-03431-DKC; 05-21078)
Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland; Roger Schlossberg, SCHLOSSBERG & ASSOCIATES, Hagerstown, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court's order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from the bankruptcy court's orders authorizing the employment of certain financial professionals in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoang v. Rosen (In Re: Minh Vu Hoang), Nos. 8:11-cv-03431-DKC; 05-21078 (D. Md. July 11, 2011; Dec. 1, 2011; Dec. 14, 2011). In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the motion to intervene. We deny Hoang's motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED