Summary
vacating a Fifth Circuit panel's decision holding that suits under § 502 must benefit all plan participants
Summary of this case from Rogers v. Baxter International Inc.Opinion
No. 03-11087.
July 19, 2005.
Jani K. Rachelson, Bruce S. Levine, Elizabeth O'Leary, Cohen, Weiss Simon, New York City, Hal K. Gillespie, Gillespie, Rozen, Watsky, Motley Jones, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Edward Patterson Perrin, Jr., Jennifer Ruth Poe, Hallett Perrin, Dallas, TX, for American Airlines, Inc.
Robert Elwood Sheeder, Jason Edward Winford, T. David Cowart, Jenkens Gilchrist, Dallas, TX, for Towers, Perrin.
Elizabeth Hopkins, Karen L. Handorf, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for U.S. Dept. of Labor, Amicus Curiae.
Mary Ellen Signorille, Am. Ass'n of Retired Persons, Washington, DC, for AARP, Amicus Curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; James E. Kinkeade, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 16, 2005, 5 Cir., 2005, 404 F.3d 338)
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.