From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milman Shwergold v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 1984
105 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 20, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Murray Myers, J.).


Defendant Evergreen Steel Corporation entered into an agreement with defendant Chase Manhattan Bank on December 13, 1978 pursuant to which it assigned a security interest in its collateral and accounts, including "all other debts, obligations and liabilities in whatever form owing to Debtor from any person, firm or corporation or any other legal entity". The real estate transaction for which plaintiff law firm rendered services to Evergreen occurred in January of 1980. Consequently, the attorney's lien on the mortgage papers cannot take precedence over the prior assignment by Evergreen to Chase. As the court held in Jackson v American Cigar Box Co. ( 141 App. Div. 195, 197): "As between attorney and client the attorney has a lien upon the papers of the client which came into his possession, but that lien does not extend beyond the interest of the client, and when the interest of the client terminates, of necessity, the lien of the attorney terminates. The attorney must look to his client for compensation."

Evergreen's interest in the mortgage papers having terminated as a result of the assignment to Chase, and Chase's lien having vested prior to that of the attorney, Special Term properly found that Chase's lien had priority. (See Effective Communications West v Board of Coop. Educational Servs., 84 A.D.2d 941. ) However, plaintiff is entitled to a default judgment against Evergreen for its failure to appear or answer the complaint. Under CPLR 3215 (subd [f]), five days' notice of the time and place for a motion seeking a default judgment must be provided (1) to a defendant who has either appeared, or (2) if more than one year has elapsed since the default. In the instant matter, Evergreen was served less than one year before the default. Therefore, notice of the motion was not required.

Concur — Asch, J.P., Silverman, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Milman Shwergold v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 1984
105 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Milman Shwergold v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Case Details

Full title:MILMAN SHWERGOLD, P.C., Appellant, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Confidential Lending, LLC v. Nurse

Upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to…