From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 14, 2002
66 S.W.3d 643 (Ark. 2002)

Opinion

CR 02-67

Opinion Delivered February 14, 2002

Attorney client — motion to withdraw as counsel on direct appeal — denied. — — An attorney's motion to be relieved as counsel on appeal was denied because the motion did not contain information regarding whether he was provided a state-funded secretary; the supreme court declared that the attorney could resubmit his motion, providing information about whether he was provided a state-funded secretary, in order for the court to determine whether he qualified for dismissal in light of a recent legislative amendment, through Act 1370 of 2001, to Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604.

Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on Direct Appeal and Motion for Extension of Time; denied.

Ben Beland, Public Defender, for appellant.

No response.


Ben Beland, a state-salaried, full-time public defender for the Twelfth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Buckie Mills, an indigent defendant, in his rape and kidnaping case. Following a trial, Mills was sentenced to life in prison without parole. A timely notice of appeal and request for the transcribed record have been filed.

Mr. Beland now asks to be relieved as counsel for Mr. Mills in this criminal appeal as a result of this court's decision in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000). In Rushing, this court determined that state-salaried, full-time public defenders were ineligible for compensation by the court for work performed in the appeal of a matter in which the public defender represented the defendant. In Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000), we relieved appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances. See also, Craft v. State, 342 Ark. 57, 26 S.W.3d 584 (2000); McFerrin v. State, 342 Ark. 61, 26 S.W.3d 429 (2000); Bolton v. State, 342 Ark. 55, 25 S.W.3d 783 (2000). [1] Since the time of these decisions, however, the law has changed. In the most recent legislative session, the Arkansas General Assembly amended Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604 through Act 1370 of 2001, which now provides that "[p]ersons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals." Mr. Beland's motion to be relieved as counsel on appeal is denied because the motion does not contain information regarding whether he is provided a state-funded secretary. Mr. Beland may resubmit his motion, providing information about whether he is provided a state-funded secretary, in order for us to determine whether he qualifies for dismissal in light of the amendment to Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 14, 2002
66 S.W.3d 643 (Ark. 2002)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:Buckie MILLS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 14, 2002

Citations

66 S.W.3d 643 (Ark. 2002)
66 S.W.3d 643

Citing Cases

Walters v. State

Accordingly, we must deny his motion at this time. See Mills v. State, 347 Ark. 695, 66 S.W.3d 643 (2002)…

Newman v. State

Accordingly, we must deny his motion at this time. See Mills v. State, 347 Ark. 695, 66 S.W.3d 643 (2002) (…