From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1979
255 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57236.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 5, 1979.

DECIDED APRIL 13, 1979.

Confirmation of sale. Walton Superior Court. Before Judge Blackshear.

Frankel, Hardwick, Tannenbaum, Fink Clark, William F. Clark, for appellant.

Preston Allgood, William L. Preston, for appellee.


This is an appeal arising from a proceeding brought by the Federal Land Bank of Columbia to confirm its sale under foreclosure of about 149 acres of land securing a promissory note in the principal amount of $100,000. Public sale after proper notice resulted in purchase by the Federal Land Bank of Columbia, plaintiff below, for $87,700. The appellant, defendant below, attacks the trial judge's determination that the foreclosure sale brought the "true market value," and the failure of the trial judge to use a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard in this determination. Held:

1. The trial judge was the trier of fact in this proceeding. The confirmation statute, Code Ann. § 67-1504, required him to call for sufficient evidence to satisfy himself as to the true market value of the property, and if not satisfied to deny confirmation and order a resale, if necessary. Am. Century Mtg. Investors v. Strickland, 138 Ga. App. 657 ( 227 S.E.2d 460) (1976). Since there is evidence in the record which supports the judge's determination, and we cannot determine that his judgment was based on a misapplication of legal principles rather than an exercise of discretion and legitimate consideration of the evidence, we must affirm. See Grizzle v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 145 Ga. App. 385 ( 244 S.E.2d 362) (1978).

2. The appellant enumerates as error the trial court's failure to receive certain evidence regarding tax assessments for the purpose for which it was intended, i.e., impeachment of one of the appellee's expert witnesses. The court stated in its order that the evidence was received and considered. The appellant's argument is not directed to any error of law appearing on the face of the record and is meritless.

Judgment affirmed. Underwood and Carley, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 5, 1979 — DECIDED APRIL 13, 1979.


Summaries of

Mills v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 13, 1979
255 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Mills v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:MILLS v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 13, 1979

Citations

255 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
255 S.E.2d 77

Citing Cases

Wright v. Home Beneficial Life Ins. Co.

However, "appellant's argument is not directed to any error of law appearing on the face of the record and is…

Huckabee v. First National Bank and Trust Co.

Applying the foregoing legal principles to the instant case, it is clear that this court cannot consider…