From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 18, 1997
697 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-04709

Opinion filed July 18, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Hugh D. Hayes, Judge.

Lee Hollander of Miller and Hollander, Naples, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The appellant pleaded nolo contendere in four cases. He has filed a notice of appeal with respect to his judgments and sentences. We have reviewed this matter in accordance with our obligation expressed in In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1991), and affirm the appellant's convictions.

We strike from each probation order a four percent surcharge on all court-ordered monetary obligations because there is no statutory authority for that surcharge. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Bailey v. State, 677 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Each probation order contains a random testing requirement in Condition (12). The second sentence of that condition states "[y]ou shall be required to pay for the test unless payment is waived by your officer." We strike that sentence in each order because it is a special condition not orally pronounced. Malone v. State, 652 So.2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

We affirm the appellant's convictions and we affirm his sentences except with respect to the specific items which we have stricken.

THREADGILL and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 18, 1997
697 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROOSEVELT MILLER, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 18, 1997

Citations

697 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)