From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 24, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 1041 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

January 24, 1957

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, JOSEPH A. BOCCIA, J.

A.J. Clarke for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.


Assuming that there was a violation of an ordinance by the defendant in double parking its truck for the purpose of making a delivery of oil, there was no showing that this violation was the proximate cause of plaintiff's damage.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 24, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 1041 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK J. MILLER, Respondent, v. SINRAM MARNIS OIL CO., INC., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1957

Citations

8 Misc. 2d 1041 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
160 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Somersall v. N.Y. Tel. Co.

(See, generally, Liability of owner or driver of double-parked motor vehicle for ensuing injury, death, or…

Latham Motors v. Blackmer Sons

It is settled that a traffic violation, to constitute negligence as a basis for liability, must be the…