From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 1958
5 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

February 18, 1958


The bill of particulars furnished by plaintiff is essentially nothing more than a reiteration of the general and somewhat conclusory allegations of the complaint. It is devoid of facts, evidently within the knowledge of plaintiff, that would advise defendants of plaintiff's claims with sufficient particularity to comply with the provisions of rule 115 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The order appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the cross motion requiring defendants to accept the bill of particulars is denied, and the motion to preclude is granted, unless plaintiff serves a proper bill of particulars within 20 days after service of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry thereof. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Miller v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 18, 1958
5 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Miller v. Rabinowitz

Case Details

Full title:IRVING MILLER, Respondent, v. BERT RABINOWITZ, Defendant, and SHARFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 18, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Pongini v. City of New York

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered September 12, 1973, denying defendant's motion for an order of…

Caivana v. Spohn

A defendant will not be required to accept a plaintiff's bill of particulars which is devoid of facts and…