From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
May 1, 1901
35 Misc. 837 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)

Opinion

May, 1901.

Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred Charles Steckler (Charles Steckler, of counsel), for respondent.


The evidence conclusively proves that plaintiff was injured through the negligence of defendant's servant, and that she was free from contributory negligence. She was seriously injured; two of her fingers were rendered useless; one of her arms she cannot raise higher than her ear, and it is quite useless. She was confined to her room for several weeks, suffered pains and aches and was otherwise physically and mentally injured and distressed. For all these injuries the jury awarded her $1,500, which, we think, was quite reasonable. The defendant thinks the verdict grossly excessive, and this apparently is the only justification which it has for taking this appeal.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.

DELEHANTY and SCHUCHMAN, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.


Summaries of

Miller v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
May 1, 1901
35 Misc. 837 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)
Case details for

Miller v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARETHA MILLER, Respondent, v . THE METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY…

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: May 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 837 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)

Citing Cases

Laible v. Wells

E.J. Hullverson, Mark D. Eagleton and John S. Marsalek for appellant. The court erred in telling the jury, by…