Summary
In Miller, the plaintiff was a lessor who did not ordinarily manufacture or sell the equipment which was the subject matter of the lease.
Summary of this case from General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Ger-Beck MachOpinion
Argued April 2, 1984 —
Decided April 17, 1984.
Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, reported at 189 N.J. Super. 543 (Law Div. 1983).
Robert E. Bennett, argued the cause for appellant ( Mark R. Silber, attorney; Robert E. Bennett on the brief).
John A. Sweeney argued the cause for respondent ( Dietz, Allen Sweeney, attorneys; John A. Sweeney on the brief).
We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Wells, reported at 189 N.J. Super. 543 (Law Div. 1983).