From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miley v. Oppenheimer Co

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 1, 1981
642 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1981)

Summary

reading Loper as holding "where the guilt or innocence of the defendant rests on his credibility, he is denied due process of law by use of a constitutionally invalid conviction for impeachment purposes"

Summary of this case from State v. Varszegi

Opinion

No. 79-2099.

April 1, 1981.

Appeal from N.D.Tex., 637 F.2d 318.


DENIAL OF REHEARING EN BANC

(Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12)

Group 1 — Denials where no member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc.


Summaries of

Miley v. Oppenheimer Co

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 1, 1981
642 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1981)

reading Loper as holding "where the guilt or innocence of the defendant rests on his credibility, he is denied due process of law by use of a constitutionally invalid conviction for impeachment purposes"

Summary of this case from State v. Varszegi
Case details for

Miley v. Oppenheimer Co

Case Details

Full title:Miley v. Oppenheimer Co., Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 1981

Citations

642 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Seiter

We are aware that state of mind is typically not a proper issue for resolution on summary judgment. See 10A…

Williamson v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Generally, a ruling that denies a party an adequate opportunity to discover facts to oppose a motion for…