Opinion
No. 17-30873
08-07-2018
PAM MILETELLO, Plaintiff - Appellant v. R M R MECHANICAL, INCORPORATED; SANDRA BELLGARD MILETELLO, Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:16-CV-1623 Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------
"This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary." Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). "Federal appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) a final decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291; (2) a decision that is deemed final due to jurisprudential exception or that has been properly certified as final pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall into specific classes, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), or that have been properly certified for appeal by the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)." Askanase v. Livingwell, Inc., 981 F.2d 807, 809-10 (5th Cir. 1993).
The Appellant, Pam Miletello, purports to invoke this court's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which grants the federal courts of appeals jurisdiction over "all final decisions of the district courts of the United States." A final decision requires the district court to either dispose of all parties and all claims or otherwise expressly permit an appeal under Rule 54(b). Charles v. Atkins, 826 F.3d 841, 842 (5th Cir. 2016).
In her complaint, Pam Miletello named three defendants: RMR Mechanical, Inc., Sandra B. Miletello, and The Succession of Gerald Miletello. The district court dismissed Pam's claims against The Succession of Gerald Miletello and Sandra B. Miletello. However, Pam's claims against RMR remain, and the district court has not expressly permitted appeal under Rule 54(b). Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction. The appeal is DISMISSED.