From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mikorski v. City of New York

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jan 29, 2004
3 A.D.3d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion


3 A.D.3d 459 770 N.Y.S.2d 860 Douglas Mikorski et al., Appellants v. City of New York et al., Respondents. Supreme Court of New York, First Department January 29, 2004.

        OPINION

        Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered August 13, 2003, denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

        Although the vehicle owned by defendant City and operated by defendant Maiorana hit plaintiff's vehicle from behind, summary judgment as to liability was properly denied since Maiorana adequately explained the collision as attributable to circumstances other than negligence on his part. Officer Maiorana's testimony that he was riding his scooter in formation as part of a presidential detail, and was some three scooter lengths behind plaintiff's vehicle--also part of the formation--when he hit a roadway defect and lost control of his vehicle, was sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether the complained-of accident was attributable to Maiorana's negligence (see Ebanks v Triboro Coach Corp., 304 A.D.2d 406 [2003]).

         Concur--Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Summaries of

Mikorski v. City of New York

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jan 29, 2004
3 A.D.3d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Mikorski v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Mikorski v. City of New York

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Jan 29, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 860