From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mid-Atlantic Construction Corp. v. Guido

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1968
30 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 27, 1968

Appeal from the Oneida Special Term.

Present — Goldman, J.P., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Witmer and Henry JJ.


Order dated April 13, 1965, insofar as it denied motion of defendants New Hartford Plaza, Inc., Loomis J. Grossman and Betti S. Grossman, as Trustees, Robert C. Baker and Loomis J. Grossman, Jr. to dismiss the first and second causes of action contained in the amended complaint of the plaintiff, M.M. Marshall Co., Inc., and denied the motion to proceed to arbitration if the issue with respect of fraud in the inducement of the contract is determined in favor of owner defendants, unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion so far as it relates to these matters granted. Same opinion as in Mid-Atlantic Constr. Corp. v. Guido ( 30 A.D.2d 232), decided concurrently herewith.


Summaries of

Mid-Atlantic Construction Corp. v. Guido

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1968
30 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Mid-Atlantic Construction Corp. v. Guido

Case Details

Full title:MID-ATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION CORP., Respondent, v. LAWRENCE GUIDO et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)