From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michela v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1991
176 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 7, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On appeal, the plaintiffs raise the same issues and makes the same allegations against the County of Nassau as they did in their related appeal in which the Village of Lynbrook was the respondent (see, Michela v. County of Nassau, 176 A.D.2d 707 [decided herewith]). The plaintiff's contentions are without merit for the reasons stated by this court in affirming the order dated December 1, 1989, which granted summary judgment to the Village of Lynbrook in this action (see, Michela v. County of Nassau, supra). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Miller and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Michela v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1991
176 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Michela v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:DORIS MICHELA et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 965

Citing Cases

Zizzo v. City of New York

Since no prior written notice of the defect had been given, it is necessary for the plaintiff to establish…

WALD v. COUNTY OF NASSAU

However, even if the cause of the condition may be attributed to the action of tree roots, it has been held…